You can easily play through the game without having to spend a cent, which, as far as IвЂ™m concerned, is pretty great value. There are upgrades to be had, but truthfully, the only time I even looked at the add-ons in the PlayStation Store was when I accidentally clicked on that button. Whereas that first game was constantly reminding you of how your experience would be improved if youвЂ™d just open your wallet, in Arena you can easily get by without spending a cent. The biggest change, though? The fact that even though itвЂ™s a F2P game, it doesnвЂ™t feel like one to the same extent that Blitz did. The pick-ups and weapons are a lot easier to use and understand than they ever were in Blitz. ThereвЂ™s competition - no longer are you just racing against the clock, but rather, via that aforementioned storyline, youвЂ™re fighting against all kinds of monsters and demons. WhatвЂ™s different, however, is that ToM: Arena has a bunch of stuff surrounding that core mechanic. To be sure, itвЂ™s still just match-3 game. This is kind of unfortunate even though IвЂ™m pleased the once-dead system is now getting a steady stream of titles, Arena is the better game, and it deserves the same kind of audience that Blitz had. Consequently, even though ToM: Blitz wasnвЂ™t great - it was your standard match-3 puzzle gameвЂ“ it was still pretty widely played on account of there being little else at the time.Д¬onsidering how many more games are out for the Vita now, I suspect that Treasures of Montezuma: Arena wonвЂ™t get nearly the same pick-up. It came out during the handheldвЂ™s troubled first year, back when the phrase вЂњVita has no games!вЂќ wasnвЂ™t just an uninformed talking point, but was, essentially, true. If youвЂ™ve had your Vita a couple of years, you probably remember playing Treasures of Montezuma: Blitz.

The treasures of montezuma 4 vita